Know Thyself through PHILOSOPHY:
Failure to cultivate virtue, failure to ponder what I have learned, inability to stand up for what I know is right, inability to reform my defects, these are the things that worry me.
-Confucius
Can you teach virtue? This was the question posed in a lecture by Daniel N. Robinson Ph.D. Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Georgetown University in the video – The Great Ideas of Philosophy S1E9: Can Virtue be Taught?
At the conclusion of the lecture, the answer to this conundrum was…. depends.
His position is that some people are predisposed and therefore able to learn virtue or proper conduct, but some people cannot. No matter how many acts of selflessness/courage shown to them, they don’t learn the lessons within them; they just don’t get it. He likened it to playing a variety of symphonies to someone who cannot hear.
“…not all are ready for it, and many are never going to be ready at any age. The students for this instruction must have already been prepared by the right sort of nature, at the right stage in life. Then indeed you might find within such persons something that will resonate when a virtuous act presents itself… you cannot present … actions that are, indeed, understood to be virtuous actions but presented to a person whose soul has been so corrupted… The point is: This is a two-way street. It’s not just a matter of holding up something. You’ve got to know who is on the witnessing side of this example and if it’s the wrong sort, no number of examples will get through to it.”
To further stress this point, there is the discussion of Protagoras’ maxim ‘Man is the measure of all things’. SIDE NOTE: the actual quote from Protagoras is: “Of all things the measure is Man, of the things that are, that they are, and of the things that are not, that they are not” which explains the abbreviation and, no offense to Protagoras, sounds more like something I would hear at 3am in a dorm room with a black light than from a great Greek philosopher and rhetorical theorist. Professor Robinson goes on to poke a considerable hole in this condensed maxim, in the vein of…You can’t possibly mean ALL men?!
“Why not just say: ‘I will act according to my caprice. I will do things that please me, and the reason I’m going to pay any attention to you at all is because you might be in a position to undo me, etc., etc. I’ll play the game in such a way as to keep you distracted, or keep you at arm’s length, but I say, at the end of the day, it’s my game that counts, and if that means you lose, so much the worse for you?’ – After all, if man is the measure of all things, then that becomes one acceptable answer to the problem of conduct. The way we solve the problem of conduct is for everybody to solve it for himself.”…
Professor Robinson goes on to say verbatim what Socrates’ reply was when asked what he thought of this maxim. Socrates’ retort is over my head, but the professor sums it up as follows:
“At the end of the day, the problem of conduct is a problem of principle, and if the principle is right, the principle is universally right. It is not tarnished nor is it reduced to something else by the mere showing that large numbers of persons don’t embrace it…No. Each man is not the measure of all things. There is a measure of things, and it is the task of the individual to come up with the means by which to understand that measure and apply it properly.”
What do YOU think? Who do YOU consider virtuous?
Last Updated on 10/21/2025 by Death of Hypatia Inc.
Leave a Reply